Responsible Artificial Intelligence Systems: A Roadmap to Society’s Trust Through Trustworthy AI, Auditability, Accountability, and Governance

Andrés Herrera-Poyatos, Javier Del Ser, Marcos López de Prado, Fei-Yue Wang, Enrique Herrera-Viedma, Francisco Herrera

This paper sets out a comprehensive roadmap for the design and deployment of Responsible AI Systems that can earn and sustain societal trust. It argues that AI has evolved past the experimental stage and now requires robust governance frameworks to ensure its ethical, safe, and accountable use—especially in high-risk domains.

The Four Dimensions of Responsible AI

The paper presents a holistic framework structured around four interdependent dimensions:

1. Regulatory Context

Focuses on the legal frameworks that govern AI use, including horizontal (e.g. GDPR) and vertical (e.g. health-specific) regulations. The authors emphasise the role of the EU AI Act as a model for risk-based governance and the need for harmonised legal oversight.

2. Trustworthy AI Technologies

Explores the technical foundations of responsible AI, including:

  • Explainability and robustness

  • Bias mitigation and fairness

  • Security and privacy-preserving methods

It highlights the importance of standards and testing for building confidence in these technologies, referencing work by ISO/IEC and the EU’s High-Level Expert Group on AI.

3. Auditability and Accountability

Auditing is presented as a bridge between technical trustworthiness and real-world oversight. The paper proposes:

  • Internal and external audits

  • Independent certification bodies

  • Transparency in documentation (e.g. model cards, datasheets)

Accountability mechanisms include traceability, redress processes, and clearly assigned responsibility across the AI lifecycle.

4. AI Governance

Extends beyond compliance to include organisational, societal, and global dimensions. The authors argue that effective AI governance:

  • Embeds ethical reflection throughout design and deployment

  • Promotes multi-stakeholder engagement

  • Encourages adaptability to evolving norms and values

Key Contributions

  • Roadmap for Responsible AI: The paper synthesises the four dimensions into a structured development pathway for organisations.

  • Ten Lessons Learned: It closes with ten practical insights, highlighting gaps in current practice and priorities for future research, such as:

    • The need for dynamic governance tools

    • Embedding responsibility across AI supply chains

    • Coordinating between regulatory and technical communities

Final Takeaway

Building responsible AI systems is not just a technical challenge but a multi-dimensional societal task. This paper offers both a conceptual framework and practical guidance for aligning AI with values like fairness, transparency, and accountability. Trust is not given—it must be designed into AI systems from the outset.

Previous
Previous

Correcting the Factor Mirage: A Research Protocol for Causal Factor Investing

Next
Next

Forecasting Inflation With the Hedged Random Forest